tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post7921978298825299123..comments2024-03-06T06:34:42.881-05:00Comments on EconoSpeak: Which Has the Greater Fiscal Impact: Tax Cuts or Defense Spending Increases?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-83267176075720488552009-04-14T16:39:00.000-04:002009-04-14T16:39:00.000-04:00"There really is no logical way to argue that stim..."There really is no logical way to argue that stimulative spending on teachers salaries is better than stimulative spending on tanks and bombs."<br /><br />Seriously? Well so much for logic, then.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-58763603464014548082009-04-14T14:02:00.000-04:002009-04-14T14:02:00.000-04:00If Chambliss can get away with this, then Krugman ...If Chambliss can get away with this, then Krugman is as much to blame as anybody for his kindergarten economics lessons and FDR-based justifications for everything he wants. <br /><br />There really is no logical way to argue that stimulative spending on teachers salaries is better than stimulative spending on tanks and bombs.wellbasicallynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-58060017842369051422009-04-14T00:03:00.000-04:002009-04-14T00:03:00.000-04:00In reference to Guns & Butter, one is reminded...In reference to Guns & Butter, one is reminded of Prof. Jane Jacobs. The fact is in this current environment, neither approach is likely to work. See: http://www.debtdeflation.comGreg Hallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18201481528278795314noreply@blogger.com