tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post557478754685680624..comments2024-03-06T06:34:42.881-05:00Comments on EconoSpeak: Bad Reporting On Latest Sveriges Riksbank Prize In Memory Of NobelUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-35190828177216376892021-10-13T16:23:37.036-04:002021-10-13T16:23:37.036-04:00But surely we can speculate... It would be less th...But surely we can speculate... It would be less than responsible not to!marcel proustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-25238938558984185552021-10-13T15:59:32.778-04:002021-10-13T15:59:32.778-04:00Good question, marcel, but we shall never know.Good question, marcel, but we shall never know.rosserjb@jmu.eduhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09300046915843554101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-13496558668736032272021-10-13T14:53:36.630-04:002021-10-13T14:53:36.630-04:00So let's dish. A number of news reports (e.g....So let's dish. A number of news reports (e.g., <b><a href="https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2021/10/12/1045152279/a-nobel-prize-for-a-revolution-in-economics" rel="nofollow">PBS</a></b>) mention that were he alive, Krueger would no doubt have been one of the recipients. I have not noticed that any of the stories that say this mention the 3 person limit on the number of recipients. Who of these three would not have received it if Kreuger were still alive?<br /><br />I have my own, not entirely well founded, thoughts.marcel proustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-85545618389972963112021-10-13T07:22:51.494-04:002021-10-13T07:22:51.494-04:00It is a must-read post about bad reportingIt is a must-read post about bad reporting500 Per Crorehttps://www.500percrore.in/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-17688567274089116992021-10-12T08:20:02.414-04:002021-10-12T08:20:02.414-04:00Timely reminder
The history of economic thought i...Timely reminder<br /><br />The history of economic thought is the history of scientific failure. Economics is cargo cult science. Walrasianism, Keynesianism, Marxianism, Austrianism, MMT are axiomatically false. Economists are NOT scientists. The EconNobel is a deception of the general public. Because economics is not “sciences” but brain-dead political agenda pushing, what we actually have is one of the biggest frauds in the history of modern sciences.<br /><br />→ links<br />https://axecorg.blogspot.com/2019/08/links-on-economics-nobel.html<br /><br />Egmont Kakarot-Handtke<br /><br />AXEC / E.K-Hhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10402274109039114416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-66490711243079877362021-10-11T14:02:02.343-04:002021-10-11T14:02:02.343-04:00Yes. I suspect there is a subtle guilt trip going...Yes. I suspect there is a subtle guilt trip going on here with the committee, given that their failure to award it to Weitzman two years ago with Nordhaus getting it was mentioned in Weitzman's suicide note. Of course, too late for Krueger, who also committed suicide and if he left a note It was never publicized. But I suspect this was on their minds.<br /><br />The paper is clearly very important, and I see conservatives on some blogs, such as Marginal Revolution, charging the committee with political bias because, of course, they have never liked that paper.rosserjb@jmu.eduhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09300046915843554101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-40392958311288774292021-10-11T11:29:48.004-04:002021-10-11T11:29:48.004-04:00Krueger should have lived to finally receive the p...Krueger should have lived to finally receive the prize. Smart guy, great person. So sad. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com