tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post7104825064178726381..comments2024-03-06T06:34:42.881-05:00Comments on EconoSpeak: RIP Sir Geoffrey C. HarcourtUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-18748542010019565372021-12-08T22:10:37.393-05:002021-12-08T22:10:37.393-05:00marcel proust,
Meeci for pointing that out. I ha...marcel proust,<br /><br />Meeci for pointing that out. I have added "Davidson" to the first reference. I had thought I had done that.rosserjb@jmu.eduhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09300046915843554101noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-39887998662728919952021-12-08T16:28:44.675-05:002021-12-08T16:28:44.675-05:00It took a long of time to understand the Cambridge...It took a long of time to understand the Cambridge controversies.<br /><br />his son is an economist down underNot Trampishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12738633092867411422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-85504362108858335092021-12-08T09:15:00.565-05:002021-12-08T09:15:00.565-05:00The first mention of Paul Davidson is a reference ...The first mention of Paul Davidson is a reference by first name only (or so I infer): thereafter (i.e., the 2nd time) by last name only. It might encourage readers to invest more in this post if their uncertainty were lessened on this point (pun intended); the obvious way would be to follow convention and refer to him either consistently throughout or by "Paul Davidson" the first time and "Davidson" thereafter.marcel proustnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4900303239154048192.post-12304443812808685142021-12-07T21:25:14.471-05:002021-12-07T21:25:14.471-05:00My understanding of the Cambridge Controversies co...My understanding of the Cambridge Controversies comes largely through his writing. A huge contribution! Sandwichmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11159060882083015637noreply@blogger.com