Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Is President Obama Taking Credit for Austerity?

Let’s put together two recent tidbits. First Justin Lahart documents the decline in government employment since December 2008 as he writes:
One reason the unemployment rate may have remained persistently high: The sharp cuts in state and local government spending in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, and the layoffs those cuts wrought … The unemployment rate would be far lower if it hadn’t been for those cuts: If there were as many people working in government as there were in December 2008, the unemployment rate in April would have been 7.1%, not 8.1%.
Evan McMorris-Santoro catches President Obama saying:
It’s worth noting, by the way – this is just a little aside – after there was a recession under Ronald Reagan, government employment went way up. It went up after the recessions under the first George Bush and the second George Bush. So each time there was a recession with a republican president, we compensated by making sure that government didn’t see a drastic reduction in employment. The only time government employment has gone down during a recession has been under me. So I make that point just so you don’t buy into this whole bloated government argument that you’re hearing.
I find this statement a little puzzling. OK, it is factually true. And the Republican Party along with its presumption Presidential nominee is currently calling for even more austerity, which would make the Great Recession even worse. But I hope the President is not citing this as one of his successes. No, it is a failure of our policymakers. Now it may be true that Republican opposition to sane fiscal policy has put our government on this destructive course. I guess the President is working on the presumption that his political opponent is not attacking him from the progressive side of the political spectrum as such a statement would be horribly damaging politically. But with Mitt Romney being the serial flip flopper of all time, you never know what he is going to say next. And if he claims that fiscal policy under the Obama Administration has not been stimulative enough – for once, Mr. Romney would be telling the truth.

3 comments:

Shag from Brookline said...

Pres. Obama has been urging Congress to provide funding for re-hirings of teachers, firemen, other municipal employees who had been laid off because of funding reductions of Congress. I don't think Obama was claiming success with such reductions but was merely responding to GOP claims that he was expanding the size of government. Obama's points about Reagan, Bush I and Bush II expanding government employment vis-a-vis recessions are accurate. Putting Obama's statements in context should not be puzzling.

Jack said...

The statement, as made by Obama, is less than clarifying. That's strange comiing from someone whose primary asset is his abillity to communicate. The President doesn't create laws. The President has been trying to come to terms with a beligerent Congress that seems bent on destroying his Presidency and not too concerned with the destruction that may cause to the American people. The people aren't all that bright, however, and need this kind of Congressional duplicity spelled out in clearer terms than Obama has yet to spell out.

sajib ahmed said...

I found this an informative and interesting article. I think it is very readable and knowledgeable, happy to see some people still have interest in this. I would like to thank you for the work you have made in writing this article. I am wish the same best work from you in the future as well kind regards...
Bruce Bent ii