Latest reports have after Putin annexed four oblasts in Ukraine the Ukrainian military making numerous gains in several of those and simply on a major roll that seems very unlikely to be stopped or even slowed down all that much, short of Putin using nuclear weapons. First Lyman was taken, now the last town the Russians held in Kharkiv oblast was taken. Ukrainian troops appear to be closing fast on both Kreminna and Svatavoe in Luhansk (or Lugansk) oblast, with most of northern Luhansk likely to be conquered if those two are conquered, which now looks likely very soon.
Supporters of Putin have argued that losing territory in the northeast was one thing, and they have also claimed that the Ukrainians have suffered major losses in this run, although they fail to provide any evidence of that. But they have said that Putin is willing to fall back there as long as he holds clearly important Kherson in the south, where there has long been a standoff after Ukraine made some gains and long announced a major counteroffensive. Putin moved many troops from the northeast to Kherson to hold off that loudly advertised counteroffensive, and it seemed to be working. But apparently there has been a breakthrough there as well now, with a tank attack on the northern end of the Kherson front breaking through and the frontline pushed down about 25 miles and still moving, with movement also happening on the southern end of that front also.
It seems that the only place on the whole front where the Russians can make any favorable claims involves the weird case of Bakhmut in Donetsk oblast. There the Wagner Group has been trying to conquer it for the last three months, although it seems not to have much strategic importance in and of itself. But while they have failed to conquer it, they have managed to move forward a few meters from day to day, and apparently are continuing to do so, the only place this is happening on the entire front. This allows local TV in Russia to report on "gains," even though these gains seem not to ever lead to much of anything. Some speculate this odd campaign continues partly due to the boss of the Wagner Group, Prigozhin, is trying to increase his power in Moscow.
So we have the Russian position largely collapsing with Putin being humiliated by all this in the wake of his annexation of these territories where he is now massively losing territory. How are his supporters reacting to all this? Pretty badly, hysterically even.
I had not watched him for a long time, but I decided earlier this evening to watch one of his more prominent US supporters, Fox News's Tucker Carlson, whose show is the most watched on cable news I believe, even now. He is full in on supporting Putin and was coming across as indeed nearly hysterical this evening. There was no mention of any of these military gains by the Ukrainians, not a whisper.
Instead, he was all in on the Nordstream pipeline incident, charging that it "is obvious" that it was carried by the US, citing statements by SecState Blinken that and end to the Nordstream pipeline would be a "strategic blow" to Russia, not to mention emphasizing that Russia owns the pipeline. As it is, the US and the nations that use the pipeline have avoided making any specific accusations as indeed it is very difficult to prove or establish who might have done such a thing.
It is reported that the nearby nations suspect it was done by Russia. As it is, Nordstream I has been repaired. With that the Swedes were apparently about to investigate the sites of the explosions to look for evidence about what happened, but the Russians began pumping gas through it, which blocks that. Big surprise that Tucker Carlson had nothing to say about that.
His argument then segued into predicting that this supposed behavior by the US is going to lead to a nuclear war between the US and Russia, somehow never noting that it is Russia and Russia alone that is threatening to use nuclear weapons. He seems to accept that Putin's annexations are justified and that indeed Putin using nuclear weapons in Ukraine would be some justified self-defense. He reported with outrage on reports that the US might sink the Black Sea fleet if Russia uses nuclear weapons, with the US doing this without using nuclear weapons, although Carlson never noted this last point. This possibility of nuclear war is all due to the US, even as the US is not threatening the use of nuclear weapons at all, only Putin and various commentators in Russia.
I have to say that I was taken aback at the intensity of his outrage over all this, the US supposedly definitely responsible for the now all done pipeline incident, and this supposed danger of the use of nuclear weapons. I now understand why I see local people commenting in my local newspaper, the Harrisonburg Daily News Record, to the effect that not only is Russia winning the war, they deserve to win the war. This is a pretty astounding spectacle, but then most of these people also continue to believe the Big Lie of Trump that he actually won the 2020 presidential election, a lie Carlson also plays a major role in continuing to push.
hard to annex something when the lines keep being redrawn as Russian troops retreat. Seems like Putin is as effective in fighting the Ukrainians as Czar Nicholas was fighting the Japanese.
This may be worse than the Russo-Japanese War back then. At least the tsar did not have people fleeing his country in huge numbers to avoid fighting.
Usually Prof. Rosser expresses clear and balanced views but his comments in this post regarding Tucker Carlson are exceptions.
It is simply not true that Tucker is “full in on supporting Putin”. Tucker regularly states his abhorrence of Putin’s actions and regime.
Rather Tucker questions the wisdom of the USA risking nuclear war and the wealth of the USA to support Ukraine. Personally I disagree with Tucker’s pacifism and advocacy of appeasement, but he has a valid point of view.
Regarding the sabotage of the pipelines, Tucker is very persuasive. Note that Biden very recently stated that it was US policy to stop the pipelines and that he intended and had the means to do so.
let me put this in an academic perspective: Carlson is whack - pro Putin, pro Orban, etc. So we should just let Russia take over Ukraine - are Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania next?
Well, I do not watch Carlson all that frequently, so maybe he is more critical of Putin than what I have seen. But he was almost frothing at the mouth in rage when I saw him, absolutely certain the US ia responsible for the pipeline incident, when it is clear we shall not know for sure what happened for a long time, if ever. He was furious, and all in on how the US must stop aiding Ukraine because of Putin's nuclear threats.
Two additional observations on this. One is that there is a new report raising the probability that it was a matter of mismanagement by the Russians, who have a history apparently of having gas pipelines blowing up due to mismanagement. This cannot be ruled out, and may well be what happened.
As for the nuclear war threat, reportedly according to David Ignatius at a conference in Warsaw, the Europeans are simply not at all afraid of this nuclear war threat, and note what I did: it would not help Russia all that much militarily. Franckly, Carlson has hjyped up a hysterical nothing on this, yes, pushing for just plain old appeasement in response to something that is just not a credible threat.
Oh, and again on Biden's statement about Nordstream II, the Germans shut it down themselves two days before the invasion. Nothing was coming through it. Apparently it has been repaired, but nothing is still flowing through it because the Germans are saying nothing will flow through it. This is onw where Putin would like the flow to be happening, but it is not because others are disgusted by his conduct. Not much about Biden or any direct action here.
Maybe Carlson is semi-reasonable at times on this. But his fevered-eyes-blazing declaration that the US definitely did this is just completely off the wall. Very few observers out there believe it was the Russians, although it may well have just been a mismanaged accident.
Given that the usual proto-fascist propagandists on Channel 1 (Solovyev et al) like to cite Carlson, I suspect Kingsley's judgment is way off.
Post a Comment