Which is to say: people seem quite concerned about guns at public meetings in Montana, but not so much when the Messiah orders more of them into Afghanistan.
The 2nd Amendment protects the right to bear arms but apparently does not protect the right to bare arms that come with wearing anti-Bush T-shirts. But wait a second, how about protection under the 1st Amendment speech clause for these T-shirt wearers. If guns don't kill people, surely T-shirts don't.
4 comments:
Assault rifles seem fine when they're being used to murder Afghans...
(Under orders from the Messiah, I would note)
Which is to say: people seem quite concerned about guns at public meetings in Montana, but not so much when the Messiah orders more of them into Afghanistan.
Really, who's side are you guys on?
The 2nd Amendment protects the right to bear arms but apparently does not protect the right to bare arms that come with wearing anti-Bush T-shirts. But wait a second, how about protection under the 1st Amendment speech clause for these T-shirt wearers. If guns don't kill people, surely T-shirts don't.
Guns don't kill people - people wearing T'shirts kill people. Or some rhetorical flourish like that.
Post a Comment